Monday, May 12, 2014

THE JAPANESE GOVERNMENT IS FORCING RESIDENTS TO RETURN HOME NEAR FUKUSHIMA

 
 
"It's all lies" from government about radiation - They are forcing us to come back and live 10 miles from leaking nuclear plant - "This is inhumane" - "I want to run away, but we have no more money" - Radiation still 300% previous levels

Ever since they were forced to evacuate ... Kim Eunja and her husband have refused to return for fear of radiation. But now they say they may have no choice.

The government and national news media have trumpeted the reopening of Miyakoji as a happy milestone

Many residents tell a darker story.

Fukushima Daiichi is still leaking radiation

The government has declared that the stipends will end next March, when temporary housing will also begin to be closed. Villagers who move back before then will receive a $9,000 bonus from Tepco

Experts say the evacuees will feel increasing pressure to go back from a government that wants to limit criticism of the powerful nuclear industry.

Tepco refused to comment, beyond saying that it had so far paid out $36 billion

The government says that Miyakoji is safe.

On a recent trip here, radiation measured up to 0.23 microsieverts per hour, about three times preaccident levels

Experts admit that they know little about the health effects of long-term exposure to low-dose radiation.

 

Apr. 27, 2014  -  New York Times,

 

Sunday, May 11, 2014

PERSPECTIVE - THE LIVING PAST

 
 
We used to learn history
By reading printed words.
 
Later,
Photographs helped.
 
Now we can experience heroes of the past -
"Alive"
By watching old movies.
 
The next best thing to immortality.
 
 
 

WHAT IS AN OXYMORON?

 
 
TRY to relax.
 
TRY not to worry.
 

Saturday, May 10, 2014

WOMEN EVERYWHERE ENABLE MEN TO MOLEST, MUTILATE AND MURDER WOMEN

 
 
Men could not succeed in abusing women if the mothers and wives of men did not support the atrocities. The women cheer them on. Many of them blame God for their crimes. They support rape, mutilation and murder in God's name. Such atrocities are not limited to one religion, however, nor to any one country, race, or class.

If the women did not support the abuse, it would not be so easy to abuse girls and women. If the women went on strike instead of striking the victims, child prostitution and the torture and murder of girls would not be such a hugely successful business around the globe.

Victims of abuse refuse to press charges. They stay with the men after the first strike, and the second. They make it easy for their abusers to torture and mutilate them - and often, their children.

The mothers of abusers protect and encourage the abuse. Isolated, the victims are helpless. Women who should protect women help the abusers instead.

Women who could protect women give their little boys weapons and teach their daughters to obey the sons.
 

Extreme: A boy holds a toy gun during a protest about a film ridiculing Islam's Prophet Muhammad in the Palestinian refugee camp of Ain el-Hilweh near Sidon, Lebanon on Friday

Irshad Manji blog and official website

In Arabic, Irshad means "guidance." Irshad Manji's mission: to guide people about Muslim reform and moral courage. Irshad is founder and director of Moral Courage  - www.irshadmanji.com/ -
 

Little children are forced into prostitution by their fathers, brothers - and mothers. The wives, sisters and mothers of abusers allow their men to violate little girls. Why do you think your son, your brother, your husband is going to India, Thailand? To buy brass bells? Really?
 


In Sonagachi's red light district, an estimated 12,000 prostitutes under 18, Indian children, are raped for less than 1 euro a day. These sobering pictures captured by Mumbai-born multimedia journalist Souvid Datta tell an important story. The subject matter of this photographic series are sex workers in India and their children.
 
Datta was inspired to shoot 'Shadows of Kolkata' for both personal and political reasons. At the age of 8 he moved to London, but would visit his grandparents in Kolkata once a year. He also has previous experience volunteering with a non-governmental organization in the area, and was outraged by the injustices caused by poor government control. The thriving sex traffic industry and the fate of Indian children troubled him deeply.

Published: Jan 14, 2014 • References: souvid.org.
 

Thursday, May 8, 2014

IF GMOs HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE, WHY ARE THEY HIDING IT ? BRAVO PETER SHUMLIN !

 
 
If the GMO companies have nothing to hide, why do they resist revealing the truth about their products on labels so that consumers can see what they are consuming  - and paying for? 
 
Do you GMO manufacturers and dealers suspect, or actually know, that your products are dangerous? Do you think that, by the time the effects of your products are revealed, manifested, proved in one legal action after another, you will be too old to stand trial for crimes against humanity?
 
Remember the tobacco industry that, for decades lied and lied and lied and denied, while knowingly killing millions of people - probably more victims than all the wars of history put together. And it goes on: As western people have become wise about tobacco, the tobacco industry exports its poison abroad so that millions of ignorant "foreigners" far away may buy and die.
 
Aren't you like the asbestos industry - lying and lying and lying, while slowly damaging the lungs of school children who innocently sat in their classrooms under decaying asbestos ceilings? The Quebec town of Asbestos continues to poison innocent people around the world because jobs and profit are more valued by Quebec than life itself.
 
Like the nuclear industry that lies and lies and lies, while it kills today's children - slowly. Just say the word "Fukushima". We may not see the cancers developed in these children for decades, but when they are sick and dying, the nuclear barons will have lived long, rich, comfortable lives somewhere far away from Japan. Like the Nazis who slaughtered millions of men, women and children and escaped to the west with the help of western interests. Think Werner Von Braun.
 
For your own gain, your rich profits, GMO barons, you do not hesitate to lie and lie and lie - no matter who you injure, sicken, deform or kill.
 
If you have nothing to hide, GMO barons, why do you work so hard to hide what you are producing?
 
Naughty things are done in the dark.
 
 
Expose the deeds of Darkness
 
Ephesians 5:11
 
 
VERMONT DARES TO REVEAL THE TRUTH ABOUT GMOs -
PROFITEERS ARE NOT HAPPY 

REMEMBER JOHN BROWN - HIS TRUTH KEEPS MARCHING ON - MAY 9, 1800

 
 
 
 
 
 
John Brown
 
John Brown was born May 9, 1800 in Torrington, Connecticut, but spent much of his youth in Ohio. His parents instilled in him a strong belief in the Bible and a strong hatred of slavery, and his father taught him the family trade of tanning animal skins. He was foreman in the family's tannery before moving to Massachusetts, in hopes of becoming a minister. After he married Dianthe Lusk, they moved to Pennsylvania, where he established a tannery of his own. The couple wed in 1820; before Dianthe's death in 1831, she bore him seven children. Less than a year after her passing, he married a 16-year-old named Mary Anne Day. That union produced 13 more offspring.

Brown was not a particularly good businessman, and what skills he had declined as his thinking became more metaphysical. He bought and sold several tanneries, engaged in land speculation, raised sheep, and established a brokerage for wool producers, but his financial situation deteriorated. His thoughts turned more and more to people he considered oppressed; had he lived in a later era, he might have become a socialist.

Often seeking the company of blacks, he even lived in a freedman's community in North Elba, New York, for two years. He became a conductor in the Underground Railroad and organized a self-protection league for freemen of color and fugitive slaves.

By the time he was 50 years old, Brown was convinced God had selected him as the champion to lead slaves into freedom, and if that required the use of force, well, that was God's will, too. After the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 gave citizens of those two territories the right to choose for themselves whether the territories would permit or prohibit slavery, Brown, like many abolitionists, moved to Kansas, taking five of his sons with him. Fervent members of the abolition movement were determined that when the territory was ready to enter the Union as a state, it would do so as a free state. On the other side, many defenders of slavery were also pouring into Kansas, in order to secure it for the pro-slavery faction.

On May 21, 1856, Missouri "border ruffians" attacked the anti-slavery town of Lawrence, pillaging and burning. Two days later, Charles Sumner, a U.S. Senator from Massachusetts, was severely beaten with a cane on the Senate floor by Senator Preston Brooks of South Carolina because of verbal attacks the virulently anti-slavery Sumner had made on another South Carolinian.

Rumors spread that the border ruffians intended to attack the anti-slavery settlers on Pottawatomie Creek, Kansas; Brown and his family were among the abolitionists in this sharply divided area. On the night of May 24, Brown, with four of his sons and two other men, rode to the homes of three pro-slavery settlers near Dutch Henry's crossing on Pottawatomie Creek; Brown intended to "Sweep the Pottawatomie of all pro-slavery men living on it." They dragged James Doyle and two of his sons, William and Drury, from their farmhouse. When the trio tried to escape, James Doyle was shot down and his sons hacked to death with short sabers. Doyle's wife, daughter and 14-year-old son John were spared. At the home of Allen Wilkinson, the avengers ignored the pleas of his sick wife and two children and took Wilkinson away as a prisoner. He was soon dispatched with one of the swords.

At the third home they visited, Brown's band killed William Sherman with their swords and threw his body into a creek. Other men and a woman found at Sherman's home were not harmed. Through it all, Brown had decided, god-like, who would die and who would be spared, though according to his followers he did not actively participate in the executions. Whenever he was questioned about the events of that night, he was evasive.

The events at Lawrence and Pottawatomie caused the territory to erupt in guerrilla warfare, giving it the name "Bleeding Kansas." Brown's name became known to the nation, a Christian warrior to many who opposed slavery and a demented murderer to many other people.

On the night of October 16, 1859, Brown led 21 followers—five black men and 16 white ones, including two of Brown's sons—on a raid to seize the U.S. Arsenal at Harpers Ferry, Virginia (now West Virginia), where the Shenandoah River joins the North Branch of the Potomac. More than one version exists of what his plans were for the weapons he hoped to make off with. Some say he intended to create a state of free blacks in the mountains of western Virginia and Maryland. Others say he hoped to create an army of former slaves and freemen to march through Dixie, forcing slave owners to free their slaves. Brown himself may not have been entirely clear on what the next step would be, but he had convinced a number of Northern abolitionists to provide financial support for his actions, here and elsewhere.

Brown's raiders captured a number of prisoners, including George Washington's great-grand-nephew, Lewis Washington. Local militia trapped Brown and his men inside the arsenal's firehouse. During the short siege, three citizens of Harpers Ferry, including Mayor Fontaine Beckham. were killed. The first person to die in John Brown's raid, however, had been, ironically, a black railroad baggage handler named Hayward Shepherd, who confronted the raiders on the night they attacked the town. On October 18, a company of U.S. Marines, under the command of Army lieutenant colonel Robert E. Lee, broke into the building. Ten raiders were killed outright and seven others, including a wounded Brown, were captured.

Read more about John Brown's Raid On Harpers Ferry

He was tried and convicted for murder, conspiracy to incite a slave uprising, and treason against the Commonwealth of Virginia. He was hanged at Charles Town, the county seat near Harpers Ferry, on December 2. Among those watching the execution, "with unlimited, undeniable contempt" for Brown, was the future assassin of President Abraham Lincoln, John Wilkes Booth.

Brown had denied any plan "to excite or incite the slaves to rebellion or to make insurrection." He never intended to commit murder or treason or to destroy property, he claimed—though earlier that year he had purchased several hundred pikes and some firearms.

"Now if it is deemed necessary that I should forfeit my life for the furtherance of the ends of justice, and mingle my blood further with the blood of my children and with the blood of millions in this slave country whose rights are disregarded by wicked, cruel, and unjust enactments, I say let it be done," he said.

The "unjust enactments" included the Constitution, the Missouri Compromise of 1820, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the Supreme Court's ruling in the Dred Scott decision of 1857.

Initial reports of the raid on Harpers Ferry in Southern newspapers tended to view it as an isolated incident, the work of a mad fanatic and his followers. But when information began to surface that Brown had discussed his plans—to what extent is not known—with Northern abolitionists and had received moral and financial assistance, Southern attitudes turned sour. Many in the abolition movement painted Brown as a martyr, convincing many Southerners that abolitionists wished to commit genocide on white slave owners. Among abolitionists, Brown served as an inspiration to strive ever harder to abolish "the peculiar institution."

North and South drew even farther apart from each other. John Brown and his Harpers Ferry raid are often referred to as the match that lit the fuse on the powder keg of secession and civil war. Even today, debate continues on how Brown should be remembered: as a martyr to freedom, as a well-intended but misguided individual, or as a terrorist who hoped for revolution and, perhaps, murder on a grand scale.

http://www.historynet.com/john-brown

MONTREAL HAS A NEW MAYOR - WILL HE CONTINUE TO COVER UP THE CORRUPTION?

 
 
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e219/DBAM/IMG_0468copy.jpg
 
DAWN  MCSWEENEY
 
Dawn McSweeney teaches Yoga in Montreal, Canada.
 
Dawn McSweeney writes poetry.
 
Dawn McSweeney robbed me of my life's treasures on October 7, 1996 - 
And she shattered my family.
 
I reported the crime to the Montreal Police as it was happening, as I was being attacked in my home at 4995 Prince of Wales, NDG, Montreal, Quebec, when I called 911.
 
The Montreal Police I called to rescue me helped the thief instead.
 
Since then I have reported all the details of the crimes of Dawn McSweeney and her self-proclaimed "partners in crime" to the Montreal Police and members of government at every level.
 
I provided the Montreal Police with all the documents of ownership to prove my claims, appraisals, insurance papers, insurance photographs, and minutely detailed descriptions of every item. Dawn McSweeney stole seven pages of inventory - all my best jewellery and cherished personal items including my wedding portrait and my darling husband's New Jersey Deputy Sheriff's badge, his trademark Stetson fedora, and his rings.
 
Member of Parliament Marlene Jennings twice declared in public that my rights were violated by the authorities three times.
 
Member of Quebec's legislature, Russell Copeman, appealed for justice on my behalf.
 
But Dawn McSweeney and her partners in crime are still free to teach Yoga, write poetry and enjoy the fruits of their crimes with impunity. Like Karla Homolka, Dawn McSweeney walks free among civilized people, looking sweet and harmless.
 
Montreal police detectives told me that Dawn McSweeney and her partner, Alex Lavergne, both refused to take a polygraph test.
 
I have volunteered to take a polygraph test at any time. The police refused me twice. They said they believe me.
 
But the Montreal Police refuse to take any action against the thieves who destroyed my family. At least Karla Homolka went to trial. Dawn McSweeney has not even been charged. The Montreal Police continue to refuse to take any action against her.
 
Why ? What immunity does Dawn McSweeney have with the authorities?
 
I believe that the reason the Montreal Police have avoided dealing with this case is not because Dawn McSweeney has any special power over them, but because that Montreal Police officer helped Dawn commit the crime on October 7, 1996, by turning over all my possessions to my assailant and warning me never to return to the house to recover my belongings.
 
Once he did that, the police at the local station covered for him - telling me to be patient and all my belongings would be returned to me -  and after that, officers along the chain of command covered for them - telling me that there were "NO FINGERPRINTS" on the cases Dawn McSweeney finally returned empty in March, 1997.
 
The cover-up followed all the way to the top - when Quebec's Police Ethics Commissioner Denis Racicot wrote that the case was closed - when in fact, it was never open.
 
In fact, in March, 1997, when I showed the police at the Mariette Station the case full of empty jewellery boxes that Dawn returned, they told me to go to the house and ask for my jewellery. I went to the house and, while I stood in front of my home in the cold pleading for my belongings, Dawn McSweeney laughed at me and mocked me - and then she called the police. The same officers who had told me to go to the house and ask for my jewellery came to 4995 Prince of Wales and asked me to leave. I refused. The female officer begged me to go or she would have to arrest me. I asked her to arrest me so that I could present my claims in a court of law. But she pleaded with me to be patient and leave. And I left.
 
I have been reporting this crime since October 7, 1996. Dawn McSweeney has not sued me in all these thirteen years. Why ?
 
Because every word I have reported is the truth, and there are no laws against telling the truth.
 
The wicked flee though no one pursues;
But the righteous are as bold as a lion.
 
Proverbs 28.1
 
But Quebec's Human Rights Commission says I am "too late" for justice.
 
So I fight on day and night for what is my own..
 
Somewhere there is a hero who will see justice done in this case that destroyed my family. I will never stop fighting until Dawn McSweeney returns everything she stole from us or she is in prison.